RE: Minutes of AUWG teleconference 17 November

Hi everyone.

Apologies for not making the meeting last night and also for not getting
an email through with regrets.

I was away for the weekend and didn't get home till late last night. I
was trying to email from my phone without much success.

I will be available for the call next week.

Thanks,
Andrew.

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jeanne Spellman
Sent: 17 November 2008 22:09
To: AUWG
Subject: Minutes of AUWG teleconference 17 November

Minutes <http://www.w3.org/2008/11/17-au-minutes> 

IRC Logs <http://www.w3.org/2008/11/17-au-irc> 

Action Items
ACTION: GP to write example for 3.1.1.1
ACTION: JS to add new wording of B.3.1.2 to next week's survey 
ACTION: JS to draft an additional bullet for definition of Prominence to
include ease of navigation 
ACTION: JS to include new wording for 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 for this week's
survey ACTION: JS to put the proposed wording for B.3.1 rationale in
next week's survey ACTION: JS to remove the note for Principle B.3.
Discuss whether to keep the concepts in another location. ACTION: JT to
draft a proposal to reword B.3.2.1 and 3.2.2

Text of Minutes
W3C
WAI_AUWG
17 Nov 2008

See also: IRC log
Attendees

Present
    Greg, Jeanne, Sueann, Jutta
Regrets
    jan, tim
Chair
    Jutta
Scribe
    jeanne

Contents

    * Topics
    * Summary of Action Items

 

 

<Greg>
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2008/WD-ATAG20-20081025/WD-ATAG20-20081025

http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2008/WD-ATAG20-20081028

http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2008/WD-ATAG20-20081028/

http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2008/WD-ATAG20-20081028/#principle-promote-inte
grate

<scribe> ACTION: JS to remove the note for Principle B.3. Discuss
whether to keep the concepts in another location. [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2008/11/17-au-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-45 - Remove the note for Principle B.3.
Discuss whether to keep the concepts in another location. [on Jeanne
Spellman - due 2008-11-24].

Authors are most likely to use the first and easiest authoring action
they encounter, therefore the first and easiest action should produce
the most accessible result.

<scribe> ACTION: JS to put the proposed wording for B.3.1 rationale in
next week's survey [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2008/11/17-au-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-46 - Put the proposed wording for B.3.1
rationale in next week's survey [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2008-11-24].

B.3.1.1 Accessible Options have Equal Prominence

If authors are provided with options, then accessible actions are at
least as prominent as other actions.

B.3.1.1 Accessible Options have Equal Prominence: If authors are
provided with options to achieve the same outcome, then options with an
accessible outcome are at least as prominent as other actions.

B.3.1.1 Accessible Options have Equal Prominence: If authors are
provided with options to achieve the same outcome, then those options
with an accessible outcome are at least as prominent as other actions.

B.3.1.1 Accessible Options have Equal Prominence: If authors are
provided with options that result in similar outcomes, then those
options with an accessible outcome are at least as prominent as other
actions.

B.3.1.1 Accessible Options have Equal Prominence: If authors are
provided with options that result in similar outcomes, then those
options with an accessible outcome are at least as prominent as other
options.

GP: prominence definition is missing the ease of navigation to the
options - burying levels deep in Properties dialog, for example.

JT: We should includean example of an accessible vs. inaccessible
template in 3.1.1

<scribe> ACTION: JS to include new wording for 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 for this
week's survey [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2008/11/17-au-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-47 - Include new wording for 3.1.1 and 3.1.2
for this week's survey [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2008-11-24].

<Greg> ACTION: GP to write example for 3.1.1.1 [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2008/11/17-au-minutes.html#action04]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-48 - Write example for 3.1.1.1 [on Greg
Pisocky - due 2008-11-24].

<scribe> ACTION: JS to draft an additional bullet for definition of
Prominence to include ease of navigation [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2008/11/17-au-minutes.html#action05]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-49 - Draft an additional bullet for definition
of Prominence to include ease of navigation [on Jeanne Spellman - due
2008-11-24].

B.3.1.2 Accessible Options have More Prominence: If authors are provided
with options that result in similar outcomes, then those options with an
accessible outcome are given greater prominence than other options.

B.3.1.2 Accessible Options have Greater Prominence: If authors are
provided with options that result in similar outcomes, then those
options with an accessible outcome are given greater prominence than
other options.

<scribe> ACTION: JS to add new wording of B.3.1.2 to next week's survey
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/17-au-minutes.html#action06]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-50 - Add new wording of B.3.1.2 to next week's
survey [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2008-11-24].

B.3.2 Integrate the accessible authoring practices into the workflow.

<Greg> B.3.2.1 Sequencing features: The application has to present all
of the accessible options prior to completing the action

<scribe> ACTION: JT to draft a proposal to reword B.3.2.1 and 3.2.2
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/17-au-minutes.html#action07]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-51 - Draft a proposal to reword B.3.2.1 and
3.2.2 [on Jutta Treviranus - due 2008-11-24].

<Greg> B.3.2.2 Sequence instuctions, the instructions for a given task
must include all of the accessibility inclusion details prior to
completing the sequence of instructions

next meeting on Nov 24

<Greg> Next meeting, Monday November 24, 2008

<scribe> chair: Jutta, Jeanne
Summary of Action Items
ACTION: GP to write example for 3.1.1.1
ACTION: JS to add new wording of B.3.1.2 to next week's survey 
ACTION: JS to draft an additional bullet for definition of Prominence to
include ease of navigation 
ACTION: JS to include new wording for 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 for this week's
survey ACTION: JS to put the proposed wording for B.3.1 rationale in
next week's survey ACTION: JS to remove the note for Principle B.3.
Discuss whether to keep the concepts in another location. ACTION: JT to
draft a proposal to reword B.3.2.1 and 3.2.2 
 
[End of minutes]






Click here
<https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/wQw0zmjPoHdJTZGyOCrrhg==
NsxLEKTq8hbG2fsFEF!gPlNbxCDb+qF6xF6Bj3G9C26e4g==>  to report this email
as spam.



-- 
DISCLAIMER:

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system.

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.  However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk



This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl - www.blackspider.com

Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 11:32:52 UTC