- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa.it>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 21:29:05 +0200
- To: "Jan Richards" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, "WAI-AUWG List" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
I think that for accessibility supported in ATAG shall means the same inside WCAG: a developer can use technologies like XHTML, CSS, JS (for Web based user interfaces) and use them in a manner that are accessible by assistive tecnologies. A solution for script-based interfaces and for RIA will be to require, in baseline, to refer to WAI-ARIA. Btw, referring to WCAG 2 for User interface accessibility requirements refer indirectly also to WAI-ARIA (if i remember well, is guideline 4.1, success criteria 4.1.2). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Richards" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca> To: "WAI-AUWG List" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:44 PM Subject: Authoring tools and WCAG 2.0's "Accessibility Supported" > > Just a thought... > > Looking at WCAG 2.0's concept of "Accessibility Supported" > (http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#accessibility-supporteddef) I started > wondering about support that authoring tools might provide. > > Checkers aren't likely advanced enough yet but I can imagine > multi-format checkers that would have settings re: which technologies > the user believed to be accessibility supported. (or similarly at the > stage of choosing formats) > > Any other thoughts? > > Cheers, > Jan > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date: 16/05/2008 7.42
Received on Friday, 16 May 2008 19:41:26 UTC