RE: AUWG Poll #4: 2 October 2007

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Jan Richards
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 10:56 PM
To: WAI-AUWG List
Subject: AUWG Poll #4: 2 October 2007


Thanks everyone who replied to Poll #3...

AUWG Poll #4:

-----

Instructions:

- Proposed rewordings, issues etc. are listed.

- Members in good standing (http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/members) have the
following "response" options:
     A: Accept the proposal
     B: Accept the proposal with the changes (then specify changes)
     C: Do not accept the proposal (then specify reason)

- Once 3 people have accepted a proposal (assume my vote is to accept
unless noted) and none have rejected it, I'll start a 3 day timer. If
the timer expires with no rejections then the proposal is assumed to be
carried

- to keep things organized, please respond to the poll as a whole rather
than to individual questions.

-----

Proposal 1: Guideline B.1.1: Modified wording intended to satisfy TB's 
concerns, New Note 2
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20071001/WD-ATAG20-20071001.html#che
ck-prefer-w3c

Response: A

-----

Proposal 2: New Term: "Benchmarked Technologies"
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20071001/WD-ATAG20-20071001.html#def
-Benchmarked-Technology

Response: A


-----

Proposal 3: Guideline B.1.2: Modified wording intended to satisfy TB's 
concerns
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20071001/WD-ATAG20-20071001.html#che
ck-leave-access-content

Response: A

-----

Proposal 4: Guideline B.2.1: Modified wording (folding B.2.1.3 into 
B.2.1.2 and so on)
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20071001/WD-ATAG20-20071001.html#che
ck-prompt-assist-user

Response: A


Cheers,
Jan

Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 21:13:49 UTC