- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:55:35 -0400
- To: WAI-AUWG List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Thanks everyone who replied to Poll #3...
AUWG Poll #4:
-----
Instructions:
- Proposed rewordings, issues etc. are listed.
- Members in good standing (http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/members) have the
following "response" options:
A: Accept the proposal
B: Accept the proposal with the changes (then specify changes)
C: Do not accept the proposal (then specify reason)
- Once 3 people have accepted a proposal (assume my vote is to accept
unless noted) and none have rejected it, I'll start a 3 day timer. If
the timer expires with no rejections then the proposal is assumed to be
carried
- to keep things organized, please respond to the poll as a whole rather
than to individual questions.
-----
Proposal 1: Guideline B.1.1: Modified wording intended to satisfy TB's
concerns, New Note 2
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20071001/WD-ATAG20-20071001.html#check-prefer-w3c
Response: ??
-----
Proposal 2: New Term: "Benchmarked Technologies"
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20071001/WD-ATAG20-20071001.html#def-Benchmarked-Technology
Response: ??
-----
Proposal 3: Guideline B.1.2: Modified wording intended to satisfy TB's
concerns
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20071001/WD-ATAG20-20071001.html#check-leave-access-content
Response: ??
-----
Proposal 4: Guideline B.2.1: Modified wording (folding B.2.1.3 into
B.2.1.2 and so on)
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20071001/WD-ATAG20-20071001.html#check-prompt-assist-user
Response: ??
Cheers,
Jan
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2007 20:55:51 UTC