- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:07:36 +0200
- To: "'Jan Richards'" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, "'WAI-AUWG List'" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jan Richards Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 5:52 PM To: WAI-AUWG List Subject: AUWG Poll #2: 18 September 2007 AUWG Poll #2: ----- Instructions: - Proposed rewordings, issues etc. are listed. - Members in good standing (http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/members) have the following "response" options: A: Accept the proposal B: Accept the proposal with the changes (then specify changes) C: Do not accept the proposal (then specify reason) - Once 3 people have accepted a proposal (assume my vote is to accept unless noted) and none have rejected it, I'll start a 3 day timer. If the timer expires with no rejections then the proposal is assumed to be carried - to keep things organized, please respond to the poll as a whole rather than to individual questions. ----- Proposal 1: The "modified" text in "Success Criteria" section in "Organization of the ATAG 2.0 Document" http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#Org -Success-Criteria Response: A ----- Proposal 2: The "modified" text in "Relationship to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)" http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#Rel ationship-To-WCAG Response: A ----- Proposal 3: "Guideline 1.3"'s new position, rationale and success criteria wording. http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#che ck-tool-conventions Response: A ----- Proposal 4: Conformance claim disclaimer wording. http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#con f-Disclaimer Response: ?? ----- Proposal 5: "New text" in Definition of "authoring session" http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#def -Authoring-Session Response: ?? ----- Proposal 6: "Modified" Definition of "checking (accessibility)" http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#def -Checking Response: ?? ----- Proposal 7: Remove "content type" and replace by Technology (Web Content) - the new definition was developed jointly with the WCAG-WG http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#def -Content-Type http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#def -Web-Content-Technology ----- Proposal 8: "Modified" Definition of "Content Generation" http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070918/WD-ATAG20-20070918.html#def -Content-Generation Response: ?? ----- End of Poll #2 Cheers, Jan
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2007 15:08:55 UTC