- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:17:51 -0400
- To: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- CC: WAI-AUWG List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Hi Phill, Yes, that's exactly what I was wrestling with. In the end, the idea of "instructions to a user agent" seemed to hold up no matter what I threw at it, from raster and sound data to plain text to markup to wiki formatting to all the various forms of programming code (all of which are being increasingly mixed and shaken). Cheers, Jan Phill Jenkins wrote: > > Interesting definition. Seems to avoid the problems with trying to > separate content from software and just puts them all together into > "content technology". > > I guess this is more forward thinking since it is hard today to separate > plain content (structured text) from interactive web technologies that > behave as old software (non-browser based) technologies. > > Regards, > Phill Jenkins > IBM Research - Human Ability & Accessibility Center > http://www.ibm.com/able >
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 20:17:30 UTC