- From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:55:47 -0500
- To: WAI-AUWG List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
- Cc: Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com>
- Message-ID: <OFE48BA1B8.DFBD57FC-ON86257323.0070F2EF-86257323.00730533@us.ibm.com>
I would recommend including the notion of encoded formats or content types that require a plug-in. For example, many content types require a "plug-in" to render the content. I suppose a plug-in is a user agent within a user agent that can't render the content type itself directly. I would separate your definition to distinguish or define interactive content types. Such as forms and widgets that change the visual presentation, such as expanding or collapsing a tree view, something more than just "clicking on a link" to go to another content type page or view. FLASH is an example of an interactive content type while an MP3 file is only "played" or rendered in audio by the player or plug-in. You always interact with the user agent, but many content types include interaction inside the content rendered by the user agent. I would strongly recommend NOT using the term "technology" to replace content type or format. Technology, Information Technology, and Electronic & Information Technology (E&IT) are much higher level terms that often include the user agent, the operating system, and the hardware to render the information. I would NOT include the notion of "programming languages" in the definition of "content", but I agree it is part of the higher level term of "technology", because much of the "programming logic" can he hosted on the server or hidden on the client and is used to manipulate the content based on user interaction and outside inputs (i.e., RSS) I copied Andi Snow-Weaver, a member of the WCAG 2.0 working group and co-chair of the 508 TEITAC Web & Software Subcommittee that is also dealing with definition. The definition and terms need to harmonized across WCAG/ATAG as well as 508 and other standards. Regards, Phill Jenkins IBM Research - Human Ability & Accessibility Center http://www.ibm.com/able Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca> Sent by: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org 07/25/2007 02:49 PM To WAI-AUWG List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org> cc Subject "TECHNOLOGY, Web Content" definition for ATAG2 Hi, On Monday's call, the term "TECHNOLOGY, Web Content" was introduced as a potential replacement for "Content Type" in ATAG2 and "Technology" in WCAG (it came out of a meeting between Michael Cooper, Al Gilman and I): TECHNOLOGY, Web Content A mechanism for encoding instructions to be rendered or executed by user agents. Technologies may include markup languages, data formats, or programming languages that authors may use alone or in combination to create end-user experiences that range from static Web pages to dynamic Web applications. Some common examples of Web content technologies include HTML, CSS, SVG, PNG, PDF, Flash, and JavaScript. BTW: The issue of techniques for creating Web Applications using DOM manipulation is covered by this reading: "programming languages" "executed by user agents" to create "dynamic Web applications". Cheers, Jan
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2007 20:59:07 UTC