- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 17:42:29 +0200
- To: "'Jan Richards'" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, "'WAI-AUWG List'" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Possible regrets. One note. In the last WCAG Teleconf there was some discussion about validity and referral to ATAG. In one success criteria there Is explanation that is possible to use invalid markup if this helps accessibility. My question is: ATAG 2.0 shall use the same reference when will refer to WCAG 2.0 (Web-Based Authoring Tools and in general authoring tools that generate markup)? -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jan Richards Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 9:35 PM To: WAI-AUWG List Subject: AUWG Teleconference on 9 July 2007 4pm-5pm ET Hi everyone, Just a reminder that there will be an AUWG teleconference on Monday 9 July 2007 at 4:00 pm - 5:00 pm ET: Call: (617) 761-6200 ext. 2894# IRC: server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #au Agenda: 1. ATAG 2.0 Development http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070625/WD-ATAG20-20070625.html Let's try and get consensus on the following: - Guideline A.3.1 [For the authoring tool user interface] Ensure all functionality is available from a keyboard. - Guideline A.4.1 [For the authoring tool user interface] Make text content readable and understandable - Guideline A.4.2 [For the authoring tool user interface] Make functionality predictable. (see here for original wording http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ATAG20-20061207/) 2. F2F at Plenary (8-10 November) (Techniques reviews ON HOLD UNTIL Techniques updated to reflect new draft) Please send regrets to the list. Cheers, Jan
Received on Monday, 9 July 2007 15:43:05 UTC