- From: Barry Feigenbaum <feigenba@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:05:16 -0500
- To: WAI-AUWG List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF4191D0BD.CCB5FD15-ON86257199.0067DE7C-86257199.0068DD1A@us.ibm.com>
General comment on layout. Too wide to fit on 8.5x11 forms with out some content being cut off. may want to fix. Problem is with figures 1 and 2. 2.1 Conformance Level triple A - Would it be better to say "All checkpoints" (vs priority 1, 2, 3) Conformance Claim components 3 Required conformance profile - It can only be ATAG 2.0, else different conformance claim A.1.1 Wording of web-based statement is poor. A.2.1 Web based criteria text should be indented A.3.3 Success Criteria 1 - this seems to require web-based documentation. Is this really what we want? B.1.1 criteria 2 - this is a hard one to do (must find or author a benchmark) and its priority 1. Are we sure we want to require this? Looks good otherwise. Barry A. Feigenbaum, Ph. D. Tool Architect Human Ability and Accessibility Center - IBM Research www.ibm.com/able, w3.ibm.com/able voice 512-838-4763/tl678-4763 fax 512-838-9367/0330 cell 512-799-9182 feigenba@us.ibm.com Mailstop 904/5F-021 11400 Burnet Rd., Austin TX 78758 AARB Representative W3C AUWG Representative IBM Club BoD IEB Member QSE Development TopGun Sun Certified Java Programmer, Developer & Architect IBM Certified XML Developer; OOAD w/UML This message sent with 100% recycled electrons
Received on Monday, 26 June 2006 19:05:31 UTC