RE: ATAG 2.0 In-group checkpoint review: A.1.1

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Jan Richards
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 10:48 PM
To: List (WAI-AUWG)
Subject: ATAG 2.0 In-group checkpoint review: A.1.1



[1] Checkpoint Text: A reviewer noted that the text should be changed to
match WCAG. A possibility (as stated in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2006AprJun/att-0016/12_2005_c
omment_responses.html) 

is to amend the text - but actually I don't mind keeping it the way it 
is to clarify its applicability - here are the two possibilities:

A.1.1 Provide text alternatives for all non-text content in the user
interface. [Priority 1]

A.1.1 Provide text alternatives for all non-text content. [Priority 1]


Roberto Scano:
I've got another proposal:

A.1.1 Provide text alternatives for all non-text content that are used to
convey information [Priority 1]

Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 21:06:27 UTC