W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: Updated URL's on Jan's Test Site

From: Matt May <mcmay@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 16:13:36 -0700
Message-ID: <412BCBA0.3000204@w3.org>
To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Cc: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>, w3c-wai-au@w3.org

Jan Richards wrote:
> Point 3 is quite tricky. I'd like to see something which asks people to 
> refrain from making false claims. But who will ask them to withdraw a 
> claim? The AUWG? A third-party reviewer? A competitor?

Since we have to create conformance reports in our Candidate Rec period, 
I think it would make sense to require a conformance report that meets 
our specs from any tool vendor that wants to use the logo. Perhaps we 
can peer-review the evaluations that are submitted.

Over and above that, I don't think there's much we can or should do. 
There's a reason we talk about "conformance" and not "compliance": we 
don't have any legal standing of our own. If ATAG 2 is adopted as 
policy, we will have to leave it to those authorities to determine which 
tools meet the requirements. They're not apt to delegate that 
responsibility to us, I don't believe, even if we were to assert our own 

Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2004 23:13:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:49 UTC