Re: AUWG Teleconference on Monday, 19 July 2004

QUESTION:
In Guidelines - 2.3 Conformance, when "relative priority" is mentioned re: 
Level A,AA, or AAA,
is this referring to WCAG relative priority, ISO16071 relative priority, or 
both (maybe-if the content is
web content, use WCAG, if non-web content use ISO16071?)?    The reference 
for relative priority (WCAG or ISO16071)
should be explicitly mentioned in 2.3, referring to definitions cited 
previously..  Currently the text
in 2.3 just says "relative priority", which may be ambiguous for a reader..

Also, when will a final decision be made at W3C on whether ISO16071 can 
even be referenced in ATAG2.0
as we're doing (if a final decision hasn't been made already?)

Could you please discuss at telecon if appropriate?

I must send regrets for the telecon, since I have a conflicting meeting..

Best wishes, Tim Boland NIST



At 01:38 PM 7/16/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>Just a reminder of the teleconference on Monday (19 July 2004)
>at 4:00 pm ET:
>
>Call: (617) 761-6200 ext. 2894#
>
>
>Agenda:
>
>1. F2F update.
>
>2. Updated documents available at:
>
>http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech1.html
>http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech2.html
>http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech3.html
>http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech4.html
>http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/guidelines.html
>
>3. Technique workplan progress check. (Monday is the deadline for VE="Very 
>Easy" items)
>
>====================================================
>
>VE: Very Easy: 19 July 2004
>
>• 4.3 (TIMING success criteria re-write) ­ JT [VE]
>
>E: Easy: 2 August 2004
>
>• ALL TECHS: THERE IS NO CAN, THERE IS ONLY DO, + lose “consider”
>wording ­ JR,MM,TB,GP [E]
>• 3.1.1 Examples x2 ­ JR [E]
>• 3.1.1(11) - Prompting and assisting for document structure ­ GP, KM,
>BF(?)[E]
>• 3.1.1(15): Prompting and assisting for device independent handlers ­
>MM [E]
>• Making minor changes to ATAG ­ MM, JR [E]
>• 4.2, success_criteria 3: JR to produce techs that mirror structure in
>4.4. [E]
>• 2 Illustrations in 4.3 ­ JR [E]
>• CMS template example ­ JR, JT [E]
>• General re-formatting of techniques ­ MM, JR [E]
>
>H: Hard: 16 August 2004
>
>• 3.1.1(10) ­ Prompting and assisting for Metadata- disguised screenshot
>of TILE ­ JT/JR, LN [H]
>• 3.1.1(13): Prompting and assisting for style sheets ­ TB, JR [H]
>• 3.1.1(17): Prompting and assisting for other types of accessibility
>information ­ KM [H]
>• 3.1.1(18): Prompting and assisting the author to make use of up to
>date formats ­ JR, BF(?)[H]
>• Barry to continue with work on High Level XML ­ related techniques for
>the document (with discussion on list). [H]
>
>Not classified:
>
>• Go over Config checkpoint (checkpoint 4.5) ­ TB []
>• QA review of ATAG work (GL’s, techs) ­ TB []
>
>===================================================
>
>TEST PLAN WORK ITEMS
>
>1. Try to put together set of templates (what questions) that can be
>used a tool - TB
>2. Updating the test plan draft since several ATAG and WCAG iterations
>have been made- TB
>3. Update Process (administrative etc.). TB
>4. “Project Review” from staff contact (MM) to W3C powers (Judy(?), Tim)
>that be explaining our testing challenges ­ MM. (timeline would be over
>a month) TB volunteers to help.
>
>====================================================
>
>4. Ideas for the next F2F location.
>
>
>Please send regrets or additional agenda items to the list.
>
>
>
>Cheers,
>Jan
>
>--
>Jan Richards, M.Sc.
>User Interface Design Specialist
>Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto
>
>    Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca
>    Web:   http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca
>    Phone: 416-946-7060
>    Fax:   416-971-2896
>
>

Received on Monday, 19 July 2004 10:04:47 UTC