- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:20:35 -0400
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Cc: 'Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG' <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, 'Karen Mardahl' <karen@mardahl.dk>, 'List WAI-AUWG' <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Gregg, I'm concerned that outsiders will hold WAI documents to a higher accessibility standard (e.g. use our work as exemplars). Even if we decide that a more official solution (such as a common WAI strategy for creating non-text alternatives in our documents) is not necessary, I would still like to run our descriptions, etc. past members of your group as part of the review process. Cheers, Jan Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > The rule I always use is... if I were on a phone call -- or existed in an > audio world - how would I present the information. > > I just describe as much as is necessary to make the point. > > Gregg > > -- ------------------------------ > Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. > Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. > Director - Trace R & D Center > University of Wisconsin-Madison > > > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf > Of Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 5:34 AM > To: Karen Mardahl; "karen@mardahl.dk"@hydra.securehosting.dk; 'List > WAI-AUWG' > Subject: Re: Re: AUWG Teleconference on Monday, 21 June 2004 - Minutes > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Karen Mardahl" <karen@mardahl.dk> > To: "Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>; > <"karen@mardahl.dk"@hydra.securehosting.dk>; "'List WAI-AUWG'" > <w3c-wai-au@w3.org> > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:34 AM > Subject: SV: Re: AUWG Teleconference on Monday, 21 June 2004 - Minutes > > > > Hi Roberto > > It's my understanding that what Jan specifically wanted to ask WCAG > about > was - how to describe the red circles. E.g. sighted and non-sighted > people > could be discussing an illustration and a sighted person says something > like > "the red highlighted part is good", making a visual comment that the > non-sighted person is not aware of. So I think we are looking for advice > on > how best to write these longdescs. Where is the fine balance between not > too > little and not too much? And how can we encourage good authoring of a > longdesc?! > > Roberto Scano: > All depends if blind people are blind since they was born or if they > become blind. Btw, every blind knows what means "circle". > I wanna suggest to leave only longdesc and remove [d] link that create a > ripetition of links with the same link title and these are no good for > accessibility throught screen readers (and, btw, we have "deprecated" > them in WCAG 2.0 HTML Techniques). > > > -- Jan Richards, M.Sc. User Interface Design Specialist Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca Web: http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca Phone: 416-946-7060 Fax: 416-971-2896
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2004 09:21:48 UTC