- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 10:06:34 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20040517095345.00ab4b08@mailserver.nist.gov>
Hi, I tried fleshing out a sample technique topic (3.1.2(18) - Style Sheets), and the attached has a sample scenario and a few additional detailed techniques. Is this a reasonable approach? If so I can tackle other topics? If these techniques are to be used in any way to satisfy conformance claims in the future, it would seem to me that they may be "normative" in some sense.. Some questions when I was doing this exercise: (1) How detailed should the techniques language be? (2) Suppose the user specifies a request for prompting and assistance that the tool is not able to satisfy? Should there be some sort of negotiation involved then? (3) Should the user be given the option to "ignore" any assisting messages and still claim conformance (since the idea is that prompts/assists should promote a positive attitude towards accessibility in the user , but the user already knows about accessibility and doesn't want any extraneous messages?)? Thanks and best wishes, Tim Boland NIST
Attachments
- text/html attachment: atag3.htm
Received on Monday, 17 May 2004 10:10:27 UTC