- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 17:49:58 -0400
- To: WAI-AUWG <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Here's my list of issues for the Vancouver F2F: List of Issues for Wombat Guidelines - criteria for a checkpoint being not applicable should be made more explicit. - authoring tool definitions should be looked at to see how repair tools fit in. - "minimum" requirements need to be thought of in the context of the evaluation techniques. - "advanced" may be too cumbersome - "rationale" should encompass most of the "notes" under checkpoints - are we going to require some level of checking beyond providing a manual? List of Issues for Wombat Techniques - need to finalize categorization scheme? numbering? - can we expand prompting appendix to a discussion of how to integrate prompting, checking and repair. - we need to look at how implementation techniques connect with evaluation techniques. -- Jan Richards, User Interface Design Specialist Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca Web: http://ultrajuan.ic.utoronto.ca/~jan/jan.html Phone: 416-946-7060 Fax: 416-971-2896
Received on Friday, 13 September 2002 17:50:13 UTC