- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 09:23:11 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
- cc: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Hi, I am wondering if we need to renumber the guidelines and checkpoints for the tiers. I think there is some value in having continuity between the ATAG 1 guidelines and the Wombat ones, even if they are presented in a slightly different order. (The numbering is really a way to refer to them, and they don't necessarily have to be in order. It depends how easily confused tool developers are). Cheers Chaals On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Jutta Treviranus wrote: > > >On Monday's Teleconference we ran short of time before getting a chance >to discuss the new draft of the Wombat Techniques. > >Please review the new draft, Jan and Matt have prepared at the >following URI and send any feedback to the list by Tuesday, September >3. This way we can get a new draft prepared for the next meeting and >continue the momentum the group has >gained into the Face-to-Face in Vancouver: > >http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2002/WD-ATAG-WOMBAT-TECHS-20020820/ > >As you review the draft, please pay special attention to the following: >- the splitting of the document by tier rather than by guideline >- the placement of the "access to the tool" guideline first. >- the comments throughout marked by red text with "@@" before and after. > >Thanks Jutta > -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles tel: +61 409 134 136 SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe ------------ WAI http://www.w3.org/WAI 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia fax(fr): +33 4 92 38 78 22 W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Friday, 30 August 2002 09:23:12 UTC