- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 21:00:09 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- cc: WAI-AUWG <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Hi folks, I am against the proposed change. I think that the more limited set of features being always available (not just integrated somehow) at a higher priority level is something that we should keep. Having the accessibility checking in front of the user is a good thing for helping users to remember to use it, and not give up because they had to look in a menu or four to find it. Cheers Chaals On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Jan Richards wrote: > >I propose that we remove this checkpoint under Guideline: Integrate >accessibility solutions into the overall "look and feel": > >Ensure that the functionalities for checkpoints 3.1, 3.2 and 4.1 are >always clearly available to the user [Priority 1] > >I think the intent of the checkpoint is well covered by another >checkpoint that we already have (we can change its Priority if >necessary): > >Ensure that all functionality (prompts, checkers, information icons, >etc.) related to accessible authoring practices is naturally integrated >into the overall look and feel of the tool. [Priority 2] > > -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2002 21:00:12 UTC