- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 11:48:33 -0500
- To: Heather Swayne <hswayne@MICROSOFT.com>
- CC: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Hi Heather, I've taken the ideas I was working on for real-time authoring added added them to your. Thoughts? Special Case: Prompting of real-time/live authored content When authoring tools produce real-time/live content, the luxury of prompting on a user configurable schedule is lost to a large degree. In addition, authors in real-time/live environments tend to be less receptive to intrusive alerts and prompts. There are several factors that must be taken into account in order to address prompting in real-time authoring: 1. Determining Need: If a real-time/live communication takes place between individuals with no special communicative needs, there may be no need for real-time prompting (but see Archiving, below). However, the author may not personally know all the special communicative needs of the participants (even if the author knows everyone personally). The tool might be able to facilitate a decision about providing supplements by asking participants which types of supplemental material they wish to have made available and then prompt the author (or see Assistant Author, below) to provide these (preferably during Preparation Time, below). When it is not possible to know the needs of everyone participating in a communication, the tool should assume there are unidentified users with disabilities. 2. Archiving: Even if there are no individuals with special communicative needs participating in the original real-time/live communication, if the communication is archived, the potential for accessibility problems increases. Therefore, the authoring tool may include an option that allows the author to run through the original communication without interruption and then, once the communication is finished, take the author through an intrusive prompting process to check for and repair accessibility problems prior to archiving. 3. Assistant Author: In some cases it may be possible to designate a secondary author in the live community, who can receive and respond to the intrusive prompts for supplemental information generated as the primary author proceeds uninterrupted. The secondary author might be an unrelated specialist, analgous to Sign language interpreter, or a co-author (helpful for describing technical drawings, etc.). 4. Preparation Time: If the authoring tool allows the author time to pre-assemble materials for a live presentation (e.g. a professor preparing for an online class), this authoring is not considered real-time authoring. The authoring tool has the opportunity to provide both intrusive and unintrusive prompts and alerts as described elsewhere in this document. For example, when the professor imports an image to be used in her lecture, she could be prompted to provide an alternative representation of that image. In the end, if the author must provide real-time/live supplements, but has no preparation time or Assistant Author, then the authoring tool can facilitate the inclusion of supplements by: -Providing previously used supplements as defaults (see ATAG 3.5) -Providing voice recognition of author speech input. -@@[what else?]@@ -allowing the author to choose the types of prompts (intrusive or unintrusive) that they would like to receive. /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Jan Richards UI Design Specialist Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC) University of Toronto jan.richards@utoronto.ca Phone: (416) 946-7060 Fax: (416) 971-2896 /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2002 11:48:08 UTC