- From: tom mcCain <tom@crittur.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 07:22:28 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
To the group: Recently, I directed some questions to Charles McCathieNevile regarding Amaya and he encouraged me to bring the topic here, to this list, for group input. Thank you in advance for the opportunity. I am helping a local school develop their web presence. As part of this project, though, I need to leave them able to maintain the site themselves (with occasional monitoring by me) and I am searching for a best authoring tool for them to use. All students at the school are blind or low-vision. Several teachers and a few students will need to do the work, and my hope is to find a program that allows them to work in a text-editing environment and apply style sheets and formatting while relying on the program to generate code that meets accessibility guidelines. (I'll provide templates and models so they mostly won't create pages from scratch.) I want the students to be able to work using a screen reader and the teachers to work in WYSIWYG. There is no perfect tool, of course, and quirks and shortcomings are just part of what we will accept in the process of what we're doing. My hope is that some people here may have some experience and insight into a best choice. I invite your response and I hope the discussion proves helpful. I need to make a choice this summer, and will be able to do some testing with summer school students. 1. For all that I am asking, Amaya sounds like a reasonable choice. http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-amaya-970220.html But Charles has reservations about it in terms of meeting ATAG, not the least of which are validity checking and a concern that it may not work well with screen readers. http://www.w3.org/2002/03/amaya5-3-atag1 Still, it looks like Amaya's basic functionality and support of accessible design is not bad. 2. Charles has also suggested looking at Mozilla, which I shall do. 3. And I wonder also about Macromedia Dreamweaver with Homesite. I'm not sure what to add to my questions at this point -- but I'd be happy to respond to yours. Thank you. . . / tom mcCain http://www.crittur.com tom@crittur.com indianapolis, indiana usa
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2002 08:23:15 UTC