- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 23:42:25 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- cc: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>, Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
All of Phill's proposals seem good to me except that I would edit his first one as follows: On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Phill Jenkins wrote: [snip] <begin quote> Note about conformance reviews There are reviews of conformance to the Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines for some tools. Note that reviews should be treated as informative, not definitive, and they do not represent consensus or endorsement of the W3C, the working group, or any other organization. PJ: ...but have followed the following process to insure some level of credibility. CMN I would change to "they have followed the following process". Charles
Received on Thursday, 13 September 2001 23:42:27 UTC