- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 12:00:04 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Carlos A Velasco <Carlos.Velasco-Nunez@gmd.de>
- cc: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Carlos, could you look at the appendix to the techniques about prompting (when I get the document done - I am starting to realise just how big it is by breaking it into manageable chunks (well, sort of manageable anyway), and give us some idea how to align the terms we are using with those used in other work (such as the McFarlane reference you cite below)? Cheers Charles On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Carlos A Velasco wrote: Hi all, Following "my" action item from the Amsterdam meeting in regard to "user prompting". As I mentioned, the way ATAG addresses prompting is quite ambiguous ("intrusive" and "unintrusive" alerts). There is work from other relevant areas such as that of coordination and interruption in HCI that can help to refine the concept. In this regard, McFarlane has done extensive research (http://www.aic.nrl.navy.mil/hail/mcfarlane.html). In his paper: McFarlane, D. C. (1999). Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction, Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT'99, Sasse, M. A. & Johnson, C. (Editors), Published by IOS Press, Inc., The Netherlands, IFIP TC.13, 295-303. He identifies four methods for coordinating user-interruption: (a) immediate; (b) negotiated; (c) mediated; and (d) scheduled. These methods could be further studied in the context of authoring tool accessibility and provide a richer perspective. There are further materials and references in McFarlane's page, although in PDF-PS formats. Regards, carlos -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2001 12:00:05 UTC