- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 22:24:35 -0700
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, WAI AU Guidelines <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
At 07:34 AM 9/13/00 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>the review of the charter is urgent
"Tracking related work in other working groups, commenting on and
integrating it as appropriate;"
WL: Perhaps get across the idea that in addition to their work affecting
ours, the converse might also happen. Accessible Authoring = Device
Independent Authoring = Usability Authoring and all that?
"Evaluations of how authoring tools conform to the Guidelines"
WL: Is it clear that this refers (if it does/should) to the class of
authoring tools as well as to individual members of that class?
"Commitments from significant authoring tool developers to implement the
Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines in ... releases."
"Implementation of the Guidelines in a range of Authoring Tools"
WL: The first of these is less important than the second - almost of no
practical importance. Commitment without Implementation is called in the
industry "Vaporware".
" The Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines rely..."
WL: I wonder if "depend" is more like the relationship?
"...the group may trial the use..."
WL: *Please* don't convert "trial" into a verb.
"The Working Group communicates with the public through the Working Group
home page and general W3C communication mechanisms."
WL: And via Education & Outreach?
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2000 13:24:43 UTC