- From: <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 14:02:57 -0600
- To: w3C-wai-au@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/ATAG1-PR-issues.html#Level I believe the issue raised by Bruce Roberts, Lotus is not being address or resolved. The issues as stated by Bruce http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/1999OctDec/0152.html >2) Re-open priority definitions to capture the idea of "average" user >that's been used in direct conversation to assign priority level to checkpoints. As a working group we've added a definition of "skill level of the author" as it applies the definition of priorities. But we haven't really addressed the notion of assuming a higher level of skilled user and therefore being able to lower the priorities assigned. Regards, Phill Jenkins
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 1999 15:07:27 UTC