- From: <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 11:58:52 -0600
- To: w3C-wai-au@w3.org
I like the wording on 1.3, 3.1, and 3.2 with the following editorial changes >Checkpoint 1.3 (as per the meeting yesterday): > > 1.3 Ensure that when the tool automatically generates markup it conforms to > the W3C's Web Content Accessibility Guidelines > [WAI-WEBCONTENT]. [Relative Priority] > PJ: delete 'W3C's' and add 'Note.' as in: Note. Some checkpoints in the Web ... are not applicable to the tool automatically generating markup. >Checkpoint 3.1: > > 3.1 Prompt the author to provide equivalent alternative information (e.g., > captions, auditory descriptions and collated text transcripts for > video). [Relative Priority] > Note. Some Checkpoints in Web Content Accessibility Guidelines > [WAI-WEBCONTENT] may not be applicable. > PJ: finish sentence and lowercase for 'checkpoint' as in: Note. Some checkpoints in the Web ... are not applicable to providing equivalent alternative information. >Checkpoint 3.2: > > 3.2 Help the author create structured content and separate information from > its presentation. [Relative Priority] > Note: Some Checkpoints in Web Content Accessibility Guidelines > [WAI-WEBCONTENT] may not be applicable. PJ: finish sentence and lowercase for 'checkpoint' as in: Note. Some checkpoints in the Web ... are not applicable to creating structured content and separating it's presentation. The section or sections in the techniques document would then have the appropriate information [proposed matrix] about each WCAG checkpoint applicability to that ATAG checkpoint. Regards, Phill Jenkins,
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 1999 13:03:46 UTC