- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 03:47:32 -0500 (EST)
- To: WAI AU Guidelines <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
On the call we discussed the idea that checking could be split three ways - things that require the author to check, syntax that is machine checkable, and semantics that are machine checkable. I took an action to write up somthing that could be used as a definition of check for in checkpoint 4.1 Proposal Check for Check for means that the tool must provide some mechanism for testing, although it may be done by asking the author to check something that the tool cannot mechanically determine, by checking syntax, which is readily automated (and required also by 2.2 and 2.3) by mechanically checking semantic information, such as searching a dictionary for acronyms, or checking colour combinations, or by asking the author to confirm guesses made by the tool (for example presenting a linearised version of a page for the author to check if it makes sense). Charles McCN --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI 21 Mitchell Street, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia (I've moved!)
Received on Tuesday, 7 December 1999 03:47:33 UTC