- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 23:18:45 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
I think the skill level stuff is easier to think about in two parts: In section 1-6, the "author" is assumed to be a person who possesses the minimum level of markup and application knowledge required to create markup in the tool BUT not necessarily any knowledge or motivation regarding the existence or details of accessible document design. As such, the tool should initially inform the user of accessibility issues with an option to suppress most of the help and justification details later on. However, the tool should never assume that the author will possess a strong enough motivation to produce accessible content that they will tolerate lengthy or complex authoring procedures in the name of accessibility. In section 7, the "author" is assumed to be a person who possesses the ability (with appropriate technological assistance) to utilize the OS interface environment (including applications that follow the accessibility requirements for that OS environment) AND possesses the minimum level of markup knowledge required to create markup in the tool. [ed. note: you can't require application knowledge because they haven't used the tool yet] For example, for a text based HTML editor in Windows95, the "author" is assumed to be capable of operating Windows95 interface objects AND has a working knowledge of HTML. For a WYSIWYG HTML editor in a X-windows environment, the "author" is assumed to be capable of operating X-windows interface objects BUT not necessarily any knowledge of HTML Jan Richards ATRC
Received on Wednesday, 1 December 1999 23:16:29 UTC