- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 13:36:50 -0800
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: love26@gorge.net, au <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
At 01:36 PM 11/30/1999 , Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >In fact we are saying "can be used by people regardless of disability". This >has important bearing on the skill level discussion, since we do not require >that a tool be obviously useful to anyone who picks it up. >As an example, consider an image editor. It needs to be accesible to a blind >user, by allowing them to edit properties of the image. But if it provides >several different methods of colour selection (eg Pantone, RGB, CYKM) like >some advanced (and even some not so advanced) tools, then it needs to explain >how to use the methods, but doesn't need to explain what the difference >between RGB and Pantone slection is - that is assumed in the skill levfel of >the user. So is it okay for it to be considerably much harder to use if you're a PWD, as long as you can use it? (Confirming, not challenging.) If my mom wants to make a web page have a particular shade of blue background, she just points at that color on a color wheel and clicks -- if she were blind, she'd have to learn RGB codes most likely. This is the distinction you're making, correct? -- Kynn Bartlett mailto:kynn@hwg.org President, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org/ AWARE Center Director http://aware.hwg.org/
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 1999 16:46:25 UTC