- From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 12:30:19 -0500
- To: Bruce_Roberts@lotus.com
- Cc: Authoring Tools Guidelines List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
aloha, bruce! could you please clarify your request, quote 1) Add text to section 1.3 that states something like: "this document is meant to provide direction for tool vendors and, given the state of authoring tools currently, should not be used by regulatory bodies to specify conformance levels until appropriate". unquote why do you consider this caveat necessary? what is to be gained by its insertion into ATAG? why should ATAG be tied to such a time-dependency, when its contents have been carefully crafted so as to be as time-independent as possible? why is it quote inappropriate unquote? when will it become quote appropriate unquote for a regulatory body to specify conformance levels based on the ATAG? good luck with the move -- i know from recent personal experience how trying a move can be! gregory -------------------------------------------------------- He that lives on Hope, dies farting -- Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack, 1763 -------------------------------------------------------- Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net> WebMaster and Minister of Propaganda, VICUG NYC <http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/vicug/index.html> --------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 1999 14:50:14 UTC