W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > October to December 1999

Proposed Text for Section 1.3 (was Re: Meeting tomorrow)

From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 12:30:19 -0500
Message-Id: <4.1.19991124122336.0099fae0@pop3.concentric.net>
Message-Id: <4.1.19991124122336.0099fae0@pop3.concentric.net>
To: Bruce_Roberts@lotus.com
Cc: Authoring Tools Guidelines List <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
aloha, bruce!

could you please clarify your request,

1) Add text to section 1.3 that states something like:  "this document is
meant to provide direction for tool vendors and, given the state of
authoring tools currently, should not be used by regulatory bodies to
specify conformance levels until appropriate".

why do you consider this caveat necessary?  what is to be gained by its
insertion into ATAG?

why should ATAG be tied to such a time-dependency, when its contents have
been carefully crafted so as to be as time-independent as possible?

why is it quote inappropriate unquote?  when will it become quote
appropriate unquote for a regulatory body to specify conformance levels
based on the ATAG?

good luck with the move -- i know from recent personal experience how
trying a move can be!
He that lives on Hope, dies farting
     -- Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack, 1763
Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net>
   WebMaster and Minister of Propaganda, VICUG NYC
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 1999 14:50:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:28:22 UTC