Priority of 7.1 (use conventions and standards)

This is in the guidelines as a P1, with the relative priority description
spelled out. I think that it should really be marked as relative priority
(although I am not too concerned either way). The Pro is that the requirement
is one that has relative priority, and the contr is thatrelative priority is
defined in termsof WCAG. (In so far as WCAG is an applicable standard, it
makes sense of course...)

Charles McCN

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA

Received on Friday, 12 November 1999 09:01:12 UTC