- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 03:11:54 -0400 (EDT)
- To: thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org, ph@w3.org
Thierry, Thank you for your feedback. The issue of particular accessibility practices for particular languages is discussed in Guideline 1, and in the techniques for that guideline. (Among other references we include the W3C Note Accessibility in SMIL, jointly authorised by the SMIL working group.) It is assumed that developers are (or will become) familiar with the languages that are implemented in their authoring tools, and the specific requirements for each language. We hope that this and your other comments are adequately addresed by the techniques for each of the relevant guidelines, which are contained in an informative document whose latest draft is at http://ww.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-WAI-AUTOOLS-TECHS-19991026 If you have further suggestions for that docuement, please let us know. Thank you for the list of SMIL authoring Tools. I will use it to update the page at http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/tools where we try to keep track of authoring tools. Cheers Charles McCathieNevile On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, thierry MICHEL wrote: Here are my personnal comments about the Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-AUTOOLS-19990903/ Maybe more comments to come from reviewers within the SYMM WG. Guideline 3: "Generating equivalent information, such as textual alternatives for images and audio descriptions of video". The authoring tools might also propose the author to add captioning and overdubs/subtitles when inserting a video or audio. SMIL capabilities are "system-captions" and "system-overdub-or-caption" Now image you insert a video in a SMIL document <video src="http://www.w3.org/BBC.rm" title="Future of the Web" alt="Interview with W3C staff for BBC" abstract="The BBC interviews Joe, Tim, and Judy .....long description...." longdesc="http://www.w3.org/Future"> and also provide a textstream <textstream alt="Captions for BBC interviews" src="BBCcaption.rt" system-captions="on"/> <textstream alt="Subtitles for BBC interviews" src="BBCsubtitles.rt" system-overdub-or-caption="caption"/> Does the authoring tools needs to provide alternative information through the attributes of the video element AND alternative information through elements textstream providing captions ? 3.3 Provide pre-written alternative information for all multimedia files packaged with the authoring tool: Not all multimedia files allow to embed text description in the file itself. In this case the authoring tool should use a database/registry to provide alternative text for each of multimedia files (as stated in 3.4) But what about multimedia files that are not provided with the authoring tool ? for example CD Cliparts that you buy. Should there be a standard format for providing a database/registry that is usable by authoring tools ? Using URI might be a way to link alternative information from multimedia cliparts. Checkpoint3.4: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-AUTOOLS-TECHS/#check-have-alt-registry refers to checkpoints 2.3.1, 2.3.4, 2.3.5 wich do not seem to exist. FYI, Here a list of current SMIL authoring tools: CWI Grins : http://www.cwi.nl/GRiNS Allaire: http://www.allaire.com HotSausage SMIL Composer: http://www.sausage.com/supertoolz/toolz/stsmil.html LP Studio: http://www.prodworks.com/lpstudio_intro.htm TAG Editor 2.0 - G2 release: http://tag.digital-ren.com VEON authoring tool: http://www.veon.com _______________________________________________________________ Thierry MICHEL tmichel@w3.org W3C / INRIA +33 (0) 4 92 38 79 87 2004, Route des Lucioles BP 93 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France _______________________________________________________________ --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 1999 03:11:56 UTC