- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 00:52:16 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>
- cc: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, love26@gorge.net, "Rosmaita, Gregory J." <unagi69@concentric.net>, au <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Maybe what we should do is put something in the guidelines document to make it very clear that the techniques include relevant refrences (not just UA guidelines - there are others which are equally important) Charles On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Kynn Bartlett wrote: At 11:12 AM 10/18/1999 , Ian Jacobs wrote: >That seems like overkill to me. Can you just point to the UA checklist? Probably, except that when we have something that people are calling crucial information, it seems like we should make sure that it's not simply lost in a crossreference. If the checkpoints of the UA checklist are considered _as important_ as the checkpoints in the AU checklist, for purposes of AU conformity, then we should list both in the same place. Otherwise we risk loss of signal via unfollowed hyperlinks. -- Kynn Bartlett mailto:kynn@hwg.org President, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org/ AWARE Center Director http://aware.hwg.org/ --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 1999 00:52:21 UTC