Re: New draft - please review

William Loughborough wrote:
> 
> The dense old geezer still is having trouble with the apparent absence
> of *specific* reference to the fact that the help/documentation must not
> just deal with access issues but MUST ITSELF BE ACCESSIBLE.

Are you talking about a checkpoint or rechnique?
Accessible documentation is covered by the User Agent Guidelines.
 
> I'm sure it is in there by indirection, etc. but I still want to see it
> ***EMPHASIZED***!
> 
> --
> Love.
>             ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
> http://dicomp.pair.com

-- 
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel/Fax:                     +1 212 684-1814
Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783

Received on Monday, 18 October 1999 07:04:57 UTC