- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 07:04:52 -0400
- To: love26@gorge.net
- CC: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, "Rosmaita, Gregory J." <unagi69@concentric.net>, au <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
William Loughborough wrote: > > The dense old geezer still is having trouble with the apparent absence > of *specific* reference to the fact that the help/documentation must not > just deal with access issues but MUST ITSELF BE ACCESSIBLE. Are you talking about a checkpoint or rechnique? Accessible documentation is covered by the User Agent Guidelines. > I'm sure it is in there by indirection, etc. but I still want to see it > ***EMPHASIZED***! > > -- > Love. > ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE > http://dicomp.pair.com -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel/Fax: +1 212 684-1814 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Monday, 18 October 1999 07:04:57 UTC