W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: checkpoint 2.1

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 20:25:48 -0400 (EDT)
To: ptr@mother.com
cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9910042021440.30037-100000@tux.w3.org>
The reason for using W3C recommendations rather than those of other standards
bodies is that W3C standards are required to support accessibility, and are
developed by a vendor-neutral consortium. In addition they are required to
promote the interoperability of the web, which is a critical foundation for


Charles McCathieNevile

On Mon, 4 Oct 1999 ptr@mother.com wrote:

  checkpoint 2.1 says to use applicable W3C Recommmendations.
  Since these guidelines are being published by the W3C, this may
  give the appearance of bias.
  Are these guidelines meant to be adopted by companies not using 
  W3C technologies?  If so, I think the guidelines should be
  standards body neutral, as well as vendor neutral.  
  Peter M. G.
  p.s. Sorry if this has been discussed before, there's not enough
  time left to search the list archives.

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
Received on Monday, 4 October 1999 20:25:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 2 May 2023 17:40:04 UTC