- From: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 09:32:55 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
- Cc: jbrewer@utoronto.ca
As per Judy's suggestion I propose rewording the Guideline 1 introduction to reflect a cross disability concern and improve the continuity and flow: The proposed rewording is: The authoring tool is a software program with standard user interface elements and as such should follow relevant user interface accessibility guidelines. In addition to applicable general interface accessibility guidelines there are interface design considerations that are specific to Web authoring tools. One such consideration is that the author may need a different presentation to edit the Web content than the one they wish ultimately to be displayed. This implies display preferences that do not manifest themselves in the ultimate markup or style declarations. Another consideration relates to the process of navigating and manipulating the document while authoring. Authoring Web content requires editing a potentially large and complex document. In order to edit a document the author must be able to locate and select specific elements, efficiently traverse the document, and quickly find and mark insertion points. Authors who use screen readers, refreshable braille displays, or screen magnifiers can make limited use (if at all) of visual artifacts that communicate the structure of the document and act as sign posts when traversing the document. Authors who use keyboard and mouse alternatives must make tiring repetitions of movement commands to navigate the document. There are strategies that make it easier to navigate and manipulate a marked-up document. Using the structure of a web document, the author can be given an outline view of the document which allows the author to both get a good sense of the overall document and to navigate that document more easily. Jutta
Received on Wednesday, 1 September 1999 09:29:36 UTC