- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 10:31:00 -0400 (EDT)
- To: WAI AU Guidelines <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
One of the things we should have before wego to last call is a good set of techniques. These need to be both general abstracted principles which are explained, rather than listed for verification, and specific examples of how it might be done, which of course makes all sorts of a ssumptions about user interfaces etc. That is not a problem, so long as those assumptions are clear from teh technique text, since the techniques do not have to be implemented, but are merely provided in a separate document as further guideance to developers wishing to implement the checkpoints and looking for ideas, or for several different explanations in order to better understand the checkpoint. One of the questions that we might want to answer is whether the techniques are satisfactory as a list of points, or whether we should be trying to create a more flowing prose framework for them. Alternatively we can let the document go to the wider review audience of a last call and see if it is raised as an issue. Charles McCN --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Tuesday, 27 July 1999 10:31:02 UTC