- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 09:46:40 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
I thought we decided to remove all priorities (e.g. replaced them with X) until we work out new definitions for priority and until we apply these definitions to all checkpoints. Also, in the current definition of checkpoint/priority I would want to see the emphasis put on the 'Ensure that content produced by the tool is accessible" part, not the "Accessible environment" part. For instance: A checkpoint answers the question "What must/should/may I do to make an authoring tool (and the content it produces) accessible?" should be A checkpoint answers the question "What must/should/may I do to make an authoring tool produce accessible content (or be accessible to all authors)?" Or for the [Priority 1] definition, instead of: This checkpoint must be implemented by authoring tools, otherwise one or more groups of users with disabilities will find it impossible to access some function of the tool, or some content produced by it. Satisfying this checkpoint is a basic requirement for some individuals to be able to use the authoring tool or its output. I'd use This checkpoint must be implemented by authoring tools, otherwise one or more groups of users with disabilities will find it impossible to access some content produced by it (or some function of the tool). Satisfying this checkpoint is a basic requirement for some individuals to be able to use the output of the authoring tool (or the tool itself)
Received on Friday, 5 March 1999 03:46:44 UTC