- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:08:02 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
My comments throughout - look for CMN and IJ On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Ian Jacobs wrote: Reference Document: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/WAI-AUTOOLS-19990617/ 4) Checkpoint 2.1.3: Change from "Enable navigation and editing via the structure of the document" to "Allow the author to navigate and edit the document based on its structure." 5) Checkpoint 2.1.5: I don't understand this checkpoint. What does it mean to edit the structure of the document? How does this differ from editing the document? CMN There are two things at work here. The first checkpoint is to allow navigation via the structure of the document, rather than simply sequentially through all the content. I propose that we add an explanatory note to the checkpoint "this checkpoint is minimally satisfied by allowing the author to navigate from element to element" (which is currently stated as a technique. I propose we remove the "edit" from 2.1.4. It is separate from navigation, which is why the two were separated, and there may be a differeence in priority as well. IJ 6) Change first sentence of Guideline 2.2 from "The first step towards producing content is conformance with standard, which promotes interoperability." to "Conformance with standards promotes interoperability and accessibility." 7) Checkpoint 2.2.2: Change "Extensions to W3C Recs" to "Proprietary extensions to W3C Recs". I'm not sure why this is limited to W3C Recommendations, in fact. CMN I agree with both of these proposals
Received on Thursday, 24 June 1999 19:08:04 UTC