- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 18:17:55 -0400
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- CC: WAI AU Guidelines <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > I propose that we add the following text after the goals: > > The priority of a checkpoint is a reflection of how important it is to > meeting those goals. > > and the following after the definitions themselves: > > It should be noted that meeting the checkpoint does not guarantee that the > goals will be met. In particular, if an author is trying to create > inaccessible content a tool cannot necessarily prevent them from doing so. It > is assumed that the user would prefer to create content which is accessible. I thought about similar text for conformance in WCAG. It was shot down. I don't think it's necessary here. - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel/Fax: +1 212 684-1814
Received on Thursday, 17 June 1999 18:17:45 UTC