- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 17:57:53 -0700
- To: au <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
The "relative priority" issue is addressed in the 527 document by this
clause:
"(Priority 1 for *** which is [Web-Content-Priority-1], Priority 2 for
*** which is [Web-Content-Priority-2], Priority 3 for *** which is
[Web-Content-Priority-3])"
How about:
"Priority level for *** corresponds to its priority level in WCAG."?
Where *** is "alternative content" in 2.4.2, "structural information" in
2.4.3, "accessibility problems" in 2.6.1 & 2.6.3.
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
http://dicomp.pair.com
Received on Thursday, 27 May 1999 20:57:17 UTC