- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 19:38:19 -0400 (EDT)
- To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- cc: au <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Aaah, but the devil is, as always, in the details.
I think there are still some larger-level issues (guideline 2.1 stands out in
my mind) which we are waiting to resolve before we can happily freeze. One of
the crucial factors in how long it takes is the amount of work we can get
done in preparing for teleconferences, on the list. We all have constraints
on our time, and should think carefully about what combination of email and
teleconference time is the most efficient way to resolve each issue to get us
to last call with a stable, thorough, and robust draft as soon as possible.
Charles
On Tue, 25 May 1999, William Loughborough wrote:
If we are to the point of discussing levels of alerting permitted under
the guidelines, I think we're in good enough shape to freeze and
publish. It's getting a bit like the QuickTips where there is a bunch
of awfully minor stuff. There are only 8 guidelines! We can go on
about the details for the rest of our lives and still not satisfy every
conceivable nuance. If we can get this set to the level of a proposed
recommendation, let's do it.
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
http://dicomp.pair.com
--Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 1999 19:38:22 UTC