- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 15:06:12 -0700
- To: ehansen@ets.org
- Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
At 03:00 PM 5/19/1999 -0400, eric hansen wrote: >I would like to suggest a procedure that will help streamline disposition >of massive amounts of proposed changes, such as those documented in my >revisions of the 30 April 1999 draft. To be honest, your proposals tend to be so huge and sweeping that it's hard for me to get my mind around them and take the hours that would be necessary with a copy of your rewrites, the original, and your email on the subject in order to figure out what's going on in there. I feel when reading these that it might be better to address each topic (or group of related topics) in a separate thread in order to get better concensus rather than dumping a straight list of changes to the WG. I admit that I have a tendency to get lost in large lists of suggestions and can deal better with "here's what I think we should do about <issue>" style of discussion. Am I the only one? -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@hwg.org> President, Governing Board Member HTML Writers Guild <URL:http://www.hwg.org> Director, Accessible Web Authoring Resources and Education Center <URL:http://aware.hwg.org/>
Received on Friday, 21 May 1999 18:10:35 UTC