- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 15:20:36 -0400 (EDT)
- To: WAI AU Guidelines <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
All the checkpoints in 2.2 (implement accessibility practices for languages) and 2.6.1 and 2.6.3 (checking for and helping to correct accessibility errors) seem to be relative in priority, as well as any in "make the tool accessible" which refer to other guidelines. 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 (prompting for equivalent content and structural information) are probably relative 2.5.1 "Understand accessibility markup for languages imported" is not relative - it is P1 that all features are understood. At least that's how I see it... Charles --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 1999 15:20:38 UTC