- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 13:56:21 -0400 (EDT)
- To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- cc: au <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
I like the idea of using document where we mean the whole thing.
Charles
On Wed, 5 May 1999, William Loughborough wrote:
On reading Jutta's proposed revision to Priority 1's definition I find:
"authors will create web content using the tool that does not conform"
and once again we are faced with the problem of the many faces of
"content". If we are tied to the definition of content in WCAG "he
content of a document refers to what it says to the user through
natural language, images, sounds, movies, animations, etc." we should
often substitute "web documents" for "web content" in this case as well
as many others. We're getting there with "author" vs. "user" so we must
get there with "document" vs. "content".
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
http://dicomp.pair.com
--Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 1999 13:56:25 UTC