- From: Bruce Roberts/CAM/Lotus <Bruce_Roberts/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 13:00:28 GMT
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
I won't be able to phone in for today's teleconference but wanted to give my opinion on priority redefinitions. I feel strongly that the definitions should stay close to the way they are. The current wording will make it much easier for software developers to produce conforming tools and markup because: 1) The wording is similar to the wording in other AI documents, in particular User Agent and Web Content accessibility guidelines. This makes it easier to gain a consistent sense in and across the development community for what compliance means. This also argues for keeping one set of guidelines for all sections of the document.\ 2) The wording is tight enough that checking comformance is possible. I believe that alternatives proposed to this point make this checking more difficult. -- Bruce
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 1999 08:53:34 UTC