- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 13:01:37 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
- cc: Bruce Roberts/CAM/Lotus <Bruce_Roberts/CAM/Lotus@lotus.com>, w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Yes, I think that it captures very well what is required. The bit about everything that is available being able to be represented in a diffrerent format is covered by 3.2.1 (although I think we could word it a bit better, along the lines of the guideline wording for 3.4 - I'll have a go later) and the access to the various properties is covered by 3.4.1 Charles McCN On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Jutta Treviranus wrote: At 9:55 AM -0400 4/15/99, Bruce Roberts/CAM/Lotus wrote: > >3.2.2: (My proposed wording) Allow the author to identify all document >elements that are editable or that affect output created by the authoring >tool. > > > Does this capture the spirit of 3.2.2? > >-- Bruce I like the rewording as long as we make it clear somewhere what "allow the author to identify" means and that it needs to be available in an accessible format. Jutta --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Thursday, 15 April 1999 13:02:10 UTC