- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 08:35:48 +0100
- To: "Charles (Chuck) Oppermann" <chuckop@microsoft.com>
- cc: "'GL - WAI Guidelines WG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, w3c-wai-au@w3.org
[migrating this one to AU] > <<2) What some people consider decorative other people consider > information. > More importantly, if alt="" is a legitimate strategy for anything that > does not see important, it's possible that page authors might use it > overmuch, removing much content.>> > > How does a authoring tool put in ALT=""? To an authoring tool, a empty edit > box means no text, not NULL text. I would have to manually edit the HTML > source to put in ALT="" in the places where I wanted it. People are not > likely to put in NULL ALT's anyway and this additional burden might sink the > possibility altogether. This is assuming current authoring tool practice. Adding a boolean radio button "Decorative: yes/no" that would have the AT insert ALT="" in the IMG tag is a no brainer. Or, since ALT is now required, hitting return in an empty edit box could just mean that: decorative, and the AT would insert ALT="" (although this one will probably be abused, so I'd rather have the AT ask for confirmation)
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 1998 02:36:26 UTC