- From: Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 21:34:39 +1100
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
(bcc: W3C Translators) > [1] http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-lang-why These are all valid points; then I’m wondering, why are both server-side language annotations, which are easiest to set and more maintainable, not mentioned, and generally no cons [2] listed, either? One could, tongue in cheek, argue that the very conclusion holds true for the reverse, that is, if authors avoided using @lang, vendors would be forced to become better at detecting it. :) I remember and appreciate our fruitful conversations from the past, so I’m only sharing this to consider what may be a more balanced view. [2] http://meiert.com/en/blog/20140825/html-and-language/ -- Jens O. Meiert http://meiert.com/en/ ☆ http://coderesponsibly.org/
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2014 10:35:28 UTC