- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 14:00:40 -0400
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: "The Croll" <thecroll@mail.ru>, w3c-translators@w3.org
At 11:19 7/3/2001, Martin Duerst wrote: >But the advertisement is really bad, just in general and even >more so because it overlaps with the W3C icon (at least on my >browser). I think there should be a sentence at the top that >tells the reader who provides this nice service, but on the other >hand makes clear that this is not part of W3C. I just haven't >thought up a good wording yet. Joseph, do you have any idea? I think that the material at the bottom of the page, if moved to the top would do the job. Since it is using the W3C icon *and* the W3C style sheet, it looks very much like a W3C page, but then the odd banner would make it appear not to be, but the effect is confusing instead of clarifying. -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 14:00:45 UTC