Re: A note about terms in XHTML 1.0 spec

At 13:23 -0800 23/01/01, Croll wrote:
>Has anyone checked the terms in the Terminology
>section of W3C's XHTML 1.0 spec?
>To my mind the spec contains not the explained terms.
>So, is there a need in them? Maybe you have to put the
>needed ones into the XHTML 1.1 spec?

XHTML 1.0 is the reformulation of HTML 4.01 in XML.

So all terms are explained in HTML 4.01.
-- 
Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
           http://www.w3.org/

      --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---

Received on Thursday, 25 January 2001 09:39:26 UTC