- From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 18:12:10 -0500
- To: cbullard@hiwaay.net
- CC: lee@sq.com, w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
>It wasn't meant to be a fair question? It is an honest one and >it elicited the honest response: fatten the file with more >markup and syntactic stuff needed to isolate the inline scripting, >and hey, it's XML. It points out exactly what we will have to >explain to people who haven't a frigging clue what <![CDATA[ >is or why they should care. Right. I think it was a legitimate question asked with the sole intent of giving everyone a reality-check. The reality is as len pointed out, in the customer's and potential customer's laps. >> I think this doesn't belong on this list -- do we need an alt.lang.xml? > >Fine. I'll take these questions to CTS. I think it most certainly did have a place on this list. It shows us one set of potential explanantion to one set of potential customers, and one set of current usage that we may well be competing against.
Received on Thursday, 30 January 1997 18:14:11 UTC